This amazing campaign

(Cross-posted at Clintonistas for Obama)

This race has not disappointed us who are junkies for presidential politics.  I am not going to review here all the twists and turns the primaries took.  Neither will I rehearse even the surprises that have occurred during this astonishing general election campaign.  But for those of us fascinated with the narrative of presidential politics, yesterday was not a day that let us down, and it is that to which I wish to address myself.

The Republican nominee for president has built his career on a premise of fastidiousness to principle even when it meant he had to step on the toes of his friends and party.  For his willingness to do this, he garnered for himself the appellation maverick.  

Yet his ambition to be president of the United States has so consumed him, he has been willing to lay aside every virtue that made him appealing during his long career in order to pander to a small but powerful segment of his party's base.  During the general election campaign, he has found himself up against a young and charismatic politician with broad and deep appeal during a time of great national crisis when circumstances in the crisis have favored his opponent.  The things that have caused some in the nation to hesitate at the selection of the younger man are personal heritable characteristics, such as skin color, name, and rearing.  Basely, and perhaps exposing some heretofore unrecognized corruption in his psyche, John McCain has sought to exploit unhealed wounds in the American spirit to gain the upper hand against Barack Obama.  Unable to make a case against his opponent based on the great issues of the day, McCain crassly chose instead to make people aware and afraid of otherness in order to advance his  personal aggrandizement.  

Terrifyingly, McCain has come close to fanning the flame of the sort of hatred that fueled the Ku Klux Klan for more than a century; his behavior caused myriad observers of the race, observers in both parties, to fear the tenor of his campaign might lead to unthinkable violence.  Moreover, McCain has fomented a narrative among his base to doubt the legitimacy of Obama's election to the presidency, if in fact, this be the outcome of the election on November 4.

Part of McCain's effort to exploit the ugly underside of American history was the cynical nomination of Sarah Palin to be vice president of the United States.  Attractive, voluble, and energetic, the governor of Alaska on even cursory examination has proven unequal to the call she received.  Her appeal to a section of the electorate most vulnerable to fear-mongering was apparent from the outset to those of us in the progressive movement.  But her selection brought to the national campaign unresolved legal problems related to per diems, unpaid taxes, and abuses of power that have proven unwelcome distractions to the Republican ticket.  Blinded by a lust for power, McCain rashly chose a running mate who has brought to his campaign a relentless string of problems.

Over a few hours on a Friday evening in the first third of the month of October, a mere few weeks before election day, the whole program became derailed.  His poll numbers crashing and concern at the tenor of his campaign publicly voiced by honest brokers in his party, John McCain had to say that Americans had no reason to fear Barack Obama as president.  Having abandoned the issues to Obama, the only thing that McCain had left was fear, but because fear as a tactic had raised the ugly specter of unthinkable violence, McCain was forced to retreat from the raison d'etre of his campaign, that is, that the embrace of change was too risky.  

Even more astonishing, in the same several hours, a bipartisan committee of the Alaskan legislature composed of a majority of Republicans and a minority of Democrats, voted to issue a report that, like some petty despot, the governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin, the Republican nominee for vice president of the United States, meanly did abuse her public trust to pursue a private vendetta.  Let us make no mistake about this: presidents of the United States have been brought to trial in the Senate for removal from office for charges of lesser magnitude than the crime the report purports Palin has committed.  As Gerald Ford famously said when he succeeded to office upon the resignation of Richard Nixon, "We are a government of laws, not men."  For justice to be served, Sarah Palin ought to be impeached for her actions, and if found guilty by the legislature of her state, she should be removed from her high office.  That's a fact, whether or not it occurs.

So there we have it.  Who knows where this will end and what paths the tale will take to reach the last period of the last chapter, but there are in this story the makings of a Greek tragedy:  a hero with an Achilles's heal in his lust for power that caused him to eviscerate his legend to achieve his ambition, and if justice be served, in the end, neither to possess the prize for which he compromised himself nor the legend for which he congratulated himself.



Display:


Re: This amazing campaign (2.00 / 2)

You have written a diary which gets my seal of approval, with highest honors! Highly rec'd and the entire remaining balance of mojo that is in my account.


"But not me personally were those cheers for"
by QTG on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 07:17:46 AM EST

Thank you. (2.00 / 5)


That's it, baby; let's go win this election!
by Beltway Dem on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 07:20:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This amazing campaign (2.00 / 2)

You're the first person I've seen who's hit on the significance of "You don't have to be afraid of an Obama presidency."  He just covered his the rationale of his entire campaign with a giant "NEVERMIND" label.

But I'm also worried about how they're preemptively delegitimizing the election.  You go to regular news blogs, and it's all ACORN.  Why is Obama up in the polls?  ACORN.

It's replaced Rezko, the scandal that nobody seems to be able to explain, as the current right-wing shibboleth.


I'm voting for Saxby Chambliss!
by Jess81 on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 07:50:20 AM EST

In some ways (2.00 / 2)

ACORN is the more nefarious narrative.  I suspect that we will hear about the "stolen election" of 2008 for years to come.  It's an effort to delegitimize an Obama presidency by the same people who embraced the fraud of 2000 with full-throated clamor.


That's it, baby; let's go win this election!
by Beltway Dem on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 07:57:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

You can't steal a landslide (2.00 / 1)

I believe the "stolen election" meme only works when the election is close. I'm getting the impression that this one isn't going to be.


I attended PUMACon '08!!!
by iohs2008 on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 11:19:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: In some ways (2.00 / 1)

ACORN is a pug talking point, but it's been around forever. To distract voters with worries over someone voting who ought not to, when hundreds of thousands are disenfranchised by the tried and true, broken machines, lone lines, challenges, removing voters from the lists, and machines programed to change results.  

ACORN is a great group - the hire within disadvantaged communities and register voters. Those faulty ones get thrown out, and there are no 'guarantees' who the newly registered will vote for.

But the more it's talked up, the more potential voters feel intimated, and fear voting.  


what a relief
by anna shane on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 11:21:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

They want to do to Obama... (2.00 / 4)

What they did to President Clinton. Even though he won the election in 1992, the vast right-wing conspiracy had smeared him so much that by Inauuguration Day he had little to no "political capital" in DC & among the people to sell his agenda. And in every big or little deed President Clinton did, the vast right-wing conspiracy looked for "wrongdoing" (think "Whitewater" or "Travelgate") to blast out on talk radio so that it could be repeated by the "mainstream corporate media". The radical right still laughs at what Hillary Clinton said about "the vast right-wing conspiracy", but deep down they know it's all true.

And now, they want to do it again... This time to Barack Obama. If they can't defeat him at the ballot box, then they want to defeat him in office so much that he can't accomplish anything and he'll always have question marks attached to his legacy in the same way that President Clinton has had to endure them. That's why it's important for us to step up now & smack down the low-blow attacks and ugly online rumormongering.


We shall overcome!
by atdleft on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 10:45:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: They want to do to Obama... (2.00 / 2)

Yes, WHEN Obama wins, the fundie militias and the tin foil hats, funded by large donors, will bang on and on about this stuff incessantly.

We must defeat these wraiths now. They're nothing but hot air, hate and bombast, and a big collective breath will blow them away. The haters will always be there. But they will be marginal and unlistened to. This doesn't stop at the GE, but this is where we frame those right wing bastards once and for all.

There was a right wing conspiracy against the Clintons: it's pay back time now. They've blown what ever credentials they had.


Now Loose on the Moose
by brit on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 10:48:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Not to rekindle a primary war (2.00 / 1)

But I think there are some key differences between Obama and Clinton. Of course, we are looking at Bill Clinton in hindsight. An Obama Presidency is an open book.

First and foremost, Bill Clinton ruled in a time when the country was trending conservative again, making it harder for him to lead and pushing him to the center. It also led to 1994. I do not believe Obama will face this problem.

Second, Bill Clinton did made many mistakes, creating an air of dirtiness. Did this detract from his ability to lead? No. But there is the saying that where's there's smoke, there's fire. I believe all the smoke gave traction to the wingnuts, and allowed them to start the vast rightwing conspiracy. Obama has his own smoke (Rezko, Wright, Ayers), but so far, it has been limited to smaller patches. There's been very little traction in the MSM. Will that change? I don't know. Again, Bill Clinton has the disadvantage of being looked at in hindsight.

Third, there is the manner in which Bill Clinton delt with these scandals in office. In particular, using the old political strategy of denying it away. But in a conservative atmosphere and seeing so much smoke, it was unsuccesful. Did bill Clinton do wrong? Compared to the wrongdoing of Bush? of course not! but people still don't see it that way. Had it not been for Monica Lewinsky, I think the world would have been very different.

Fourth, all of the Bill Clinton stuff played out in a time before the Internet really took off. Back then, a conservative could generate a meme on talk radio and it would take forever and a day for the truth to catch up. Now, we're all over these cons like white on rice. Liberals have their own media.

Finally, there's Ross Perot. In 1992, Bill Clinton didn't win with a plurality. This started the meme amongst Republicans (remember, talk radio had been going since 1988 or so) that they had received a "raw deal"; that the majority of people had voted against this guy and due to chicanery he had snuck in. Is it true? No. I think without Perot, he would have won in a landslide. He did win in an electoral landslide. And he won reelection in 1996 by a landslide.

So no, I don't think 2002 will be like 1994, but again, we don't know.


I attended PUMACon '08!!!
by iohs2008 on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 11:35:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I've thought the same thing (none / 0)

for quite a while now.  Its the same MO they used with Clinton - taking the trash they used in the elections and carrying it on past the election, via the news media and DC punditry, as a tool to limit the new president's ability to enact an agenda.

Obama has an advantage this time around with an economy in crisis.  The Mighty Wurlitzer of the news media is sufficiently concerned about the economy they'll be less willing to help facilitate the GOP's agenda.  Only the right wing hate media will keep beating the drum.

That's not to say Obama will be safe for long.  If the crisis is resolved, watch the same Clintonesque media harrassment begin.  Its how corporate America advances their agenda in DC.


by Betsy McCall on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 05:40:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Salve for the loser's soul (none / 0)

Attempts at delegitimization of the victor are just politics.

The key question is: how successful will they be?

When the magnitude of the supposed scandal is high, and the margin of victory is low, then delegitimization gains traction.

The problem for the wingnuts is: I don't think this election is going to be close, and ACORN is really no bigger than its name implies.

People have shown tremendous ability in this election so far to separate the wheat from the chaff in terms of scandals.

No one's going to care about 4000 votes in Nevada if Obama carries the state 55/45.


I attended PUMACon '08!!!
by iohs2008 on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 11:05:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Go Greek! (2.00 / 4)

I'm amazed that the media has latched on to the word "Shakesperian" to describe McCain's tradgedy, when the parallel seems so clear to me.

CREON
    Then take this foolish man away from here.
    I killed you, my son, without intending to,
    and you, as well, my wife. How useless I am now.
    I don't know where to look or find support.
    Everything I touch goes wrong, and on my head
    fate climbs up with its overwhelming load.  

This is true not just of McCain, but of Bush. It's impossible to describe the mix of emotions I get when I look at this picture of Bush... but maybe it's the beginning of catharsis.

CHORUS
    The most important part of true success
    is wisdom--not to act impiously
    towards the gods, for boasts of arrogant men
    bring on great blows of punishment--
    so in old age men can discover wisdom.


by Exhausted Pennsylvanian on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 09:37:54 AM EST

I have thought that (2.00 / 3)

Bush finally looks like a beaten man.  He is a dark page in American history.


That's it, baby; let's go win this election!
by Beltway Dem on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 10:01:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Greek is good, and shakespeare nails it too.... (2.00 / 2)

"For when my outward action doth demonstrate
The native act and figure of my heart
In compliment extern, 'tis not long after
But I will wear my heart upon my sleeve
For daws to peck at: I am not what I am."
I will wear my heart upon my sleeve For daws to peck at
by Iago on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 11:14:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Seriously love this diary. (2.00 / 3)

As I said over on the Moose, when this thing ends, I'm going to feel a bit of pity for McCain and what he's done to his legacy -- all for a shot at the big time.


Even John McCain lusts after teh engels.
by sricki on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 10:08:42 AM EST

Re: This amazing campaign (2.00 / 1)

superb essay


by wrb on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 06:38:00 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.